Hat is the question

[Original Link] John has been discussing millinery. Actually, it isn’t millinery, because that’s women’s hats. Is there an equivalent term for men’s headgear? Hattery will get you nowhere.

Anyway, John and I have the same problem, which is a need to protect our heads from the sun, in much the same way as Cray supercomputers require substantial cooling systems. But we both have a natural aversion to baseball caps, and John, who has been experimenting with various options including a rather elegant panama asks whether I have a secret hat habit?

And the answer is yes. I also have a panama, which I bought one year at Henley Regatta, but I don’t think I can carry it off except when wearing a blazer, which isn’t often. My other hats tend to be sufficiently embarrassing that I don’t wear them except when well away from my home turf where, let’s face it, the heat of the noonday sun is seldom much of a problem anyway.

My first hat I bought in Ambleside because it cost less than the tube of sun cream I was thinking of buying. I call it my “guess which country I’m from…” hat because nobody but a Brit on holiday would be seen dead in it. Looking back through my photos, I don’t seem to have a picture of it. Which is just too bad.

My main hat is made by the Henschel Hat Co. of St Louis, Missouri and was purchased in Georgetown in Washington DC.

Mmm. Works in all weathers, too. This is Brussels in mid-winter:

The trouble is that it doesn’t fold, roll or collapse in any way and so takes up quite a bit of my suitcase, so I often don’t have it when I need it, like last week.

So last week I bought this rather fetching little number:

OK, say what you like, but it’s comfortable and fits in my pocket. Not sure any of these suggestions would be quite right for a man of John‘s standing, though!

The Death of the Media Lab?

[Original Link] John Naughton’s blog had a link to this interesting article by Philip Greenspun about the MIT Media Lab’s mode of operation, which in turn was a response to this Wired article about its current funding crisis and likely future.

When I visited the Lab a few years back, I, like many others, thought, “this is fun, but who pays for it?” I was a student at the time, and so I didn’t worry too much about these things. But I was working on similar stuff, and so was glad that somebody, or some bodies, had the vision to fund the wacky stuff.

The Media Lab is a bit like manned spaceflight. It probably doesn’t make sense, the funders seldom get their money back, there are more efficient ways to use resources, and so on. But the world would be a much less interesting place to live in without it.
I hope it survives. Or that something more exciting, rather than just more practical, rises up to replace it.

[untitled]

Just back from the Lake District, which was as beautiful as ever.

This time, however, we had a week of the best weather I can remember ever having in many many visits. A real joy.

ImageWell

[Original Link] Some bits of software are really elegant in their simplicity. Imagewell is brilliant – small, simple, useful, and with great online help. Congrats to Xtralean and thanks to John Naughton and John Robb for the link.

3d Munitions

[Original Link] I guess it’s only a matter of time before the ‘Iraq War’ computer games start appearing, but this does feel a bit as if CNN is trying to get there first…

osx2x

[Original Link] Got a Linux box and an OS X box? Michael Dales’ handy utility may save you desk space.

Furtive phone photography spurs ban

[Original Link] As camera phones become more popular, lots of organisations are restricting how they can be used. [BBC News | Technology | UK Edition]

There are going to be some interesting socialogical issues here. Cameras will soon be common in everything from keyrings to pens to watches. What sort of new etiquette will evolve for dealing with them?

Getting at your data

Possibly the best aspect of OpenOffice is its open file format.. Here’s a very crude quick and easy way on a Unix platform to get at something close to the raw text in an OO document:

   unzip -p mydocument.sxw  content.xml | sed 's/<[^>]*>/ /g'

This extracts the contents of the document as XML, then strips out most XML tags. Could be improved in many ways, but this is fine if you want to run the text through grep, wc etc or just want to get your paragraphs into a text editor. Is any normal user likely to do this? No, but it’s important that it can be done, even on a machine which knows nothing about OpenOffice.

(Here’s why I think this sort of thing is important, by the way.)

Benefits of budget cuts

[Original Link] From Robert Cringely’s article:

Sun Microsystems recently sponsored a major seminar at George
Washington University in the Washington area and the federal
government’s IT people attended. One source said that the
present administration has so strangled the budgets of
government agencies, especially research and education, that
they’re now considering dumping Microsoft’s licensing schemes
and transitioning to open-source Linux.

Thanks to Scott Weikart for the link.

The Skill of Writing

[Original Link] Tim O’Reilly on a favourite quote of his by Edwin Schlossberg:

“The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think”.

And would it be too cynical to say that the skill of politics is to create a context in which they can’t?

Microsoft Office Depot

[Original Link] This came out a week ago but I’ve only just seen it. Office Depot (which, for UK readers, is the US equivalent of Office World or Staples) is apparently not going to carry hardware or software items unless they have the ‘Designed for Windows XP’ logo on them. So if you want to pop down to your local store for a copy of RedHat, you’ll need to do so before May 30th.

Design Question for the day

Every mobile I’ve had (I think) allows me to set a personal text greeting so that when I turn it on it says ‘Quentin’s Phone’ or something similar. But in every case, this appears after I’ve typed in the PIN number.

Now, will somebody tell me what this is for? If I’ve typed in the PIN, I know it’s my phone and don’t need to be told. If, on the other hand, I don’t know the PIN, it’s probably somebody else’s phone and the only way I will get it back to them is by knowing their name, which I can’t see…

Or is there some other intended use for this feature? Perhaps an inspiring message for the day? Or a joke to cheer you up when nobody’s left you any voice mails?

But perhaps these days PINs don’t make too much sense. Most operators will disable a mobile using the handset serial number once they know it’s stolen, so there shouldn’t be a great incentive for stealing them. And if you lose it, the more access any well-wishing finder has to your data, the more likely you are to get it back.

© Copyright Quentin Stafford-Fraser