Status-Q

This is my dream for the PC of the future. First, the simple bit. It has a rewind button. Or, more precisely, a jog-dial. So you can rewind the computer to any point in the past, to a fraction of a second, and get any application, or indeed the entire system, back to exactly as it was then, right down to the mouse position.

This would require a lot of storage, but at some stage that won’t be a problem, and it would have all sorts of very cool side-effects, like eliminating the need to explicitly save your documents from time to time. We do it now as a way of saying, “these are the changes I want to keep”. But when all of your changes are kept, you can just name a document and always work on the latest version. If you don’t like your changes, just rewind.

Or how about showing your software supplier or help desk just exactly what you did just before your system crashed. Or being able to rewind to the point just before you clicked that ‘Delete Everything’ button…

Backups would consist of maintaining some copies of your full system history. No need to worry about whether they were full or incremental backups, or how often you had made them in the past, because every one would contain the history of everything you’ve done. The technology would need a quick way of doing “freeze! – duplicate entire storage! – continue!”.

I think this would be great.

Then we get to the second, more complicated part, and I haven’t worked this out properly yet. It’s fine if you just want to rewind your whole system to the day before yesterday, and look at where you were then. You could even start again from that point as if nothing further had happened.

But suppose you just want to try cancelling something you did then before fast-forwarding to the present and continuing where you left off? That’s like using a time machine to change one small bit of the past and hoping it doesn’t have awkard implications when you get back to the present. I don’t think it can be done in the general case, though the system might be built in a sufficiently compartmentalised fashion that a certain amount of this was possible.

You might, however, be able to do a ‘what-if’ scenario. “Would this application have run successfully if I hadn’t installed that service pack yesterday?” You could rewind and fork off a separate, identical copy of the PC’s state, perhaps using the backup technology described earlier, and work on that. If that world turned out to be better, you could switch to it. If necessary, you might pop back to your old universe for a moment, make copies of important stuff onto a separate system or some kind of removable storage, and then go back to your new world and import it just as if it had come from somewhere else.

Needs more thinking about…

[Original Link] An interesting new cordless interface device for your PC – one dedicated to instant messaging.

[Original Link] Longish but interesting article by Paul Graham on whether hackers, normally classified amongst engineers & scientists, should be better described as artists…

It’s 5 a.m. and I’m awake. Those who know me well will confirm that that’s a notable event. Ask any of the chaps at the Drones.
“Capital fellow”, they’ll tell you, “but not a bird given to catching the worm”.
It’s partly because I have 8 hours of jetlag to deal with, and partly because I’ve just been woken by a very loud dawn chorus. One blackbird, in particular, was singing for all he was worth about 3 feet away from my open window. I badly needed the sleep, but after 10 days in a city hotel where even opening windows wasn’t possible, I can’t think of many better ways to be woken up.

A friend of mine said that mobile phones are the only thing about which men argue over whose is the smallest.
I know another topic for ‘inverse size envy’: email addresses. Until recently I was quentin @ att.com, which I thought was pretty good, but a friend who works for Electronic Arts told me at the weekend that he had two initials before the @ea.com. 9 characters in total. My shortest valid address at present is my 3 initials followed by @pobox.com. 13 characters. I feel suitably humbled.

[Original Link] If the copyright system is broken, then roll your own. That’s what Creative Commons are doing. And O’Reilly and others are using it.

My friend Martin King drew my attention to this wonderful example of journalistic differences. Even if you only read the headlines, have a look at the same talk by Alan Greenspan reported in the Seattle Times and the Economist.